![]() My paper will look at the meaning and purpose of social condensers by investigating the revolution of Narkomfin by Moisej Ginzburg and Ignatij Milinis, and comparing their latter generation aspects. However, the terms of social condenser have been redefined over time by architects, and this concept potentially enhances equality and interaction for people in society. Since the late 1920s, Constructivists and architects have promoted the notion of the Social Condenser and it has become one of the most powerful architectural concepts produced in the Soviet Union until nowadays. ![]() This skepticism can only be met with the concrete elaboration of a grand theory and via the reality of a grand new movement and style. This scepticism within architecture coincides with the general distrust for grand comprehensive theories in philosophy and the social science. Many have come to believe that this world is too fragmented and contested to allow for a unified collective architectural agenda analogous to the modern movement. The world within which architecture must try to redefine its role and agenda seems much more complex and uncertain than the world in which architectural modernism made its mark 60 years ago. Such clarity and unity must not be based on prejudice or a simplistic world view. Clarity and unity of agenda are necessary preconditions for effective collective action. This paper proposes a unified theory, agenda and epochal style for architecture, urbanism and all the design disciplines (parametricism ), argued for on the basis of an overarching theory of society (Luhmann’s social systems theory). Today we are at the intersection of world global experiences and realms that would either passively shape our worlds, or would allow us to take the lead, as designers, and shape a well defined and progressive built environment for future cities and future genrations. Technology is a key factor of change, and an active component at the intersection of world civilizations and cultures that would potentially drive the creation of a deep and enrooted contemporary built environment. In a broader context, the research would focus on the roots of understanding the built, political, cultural, social, and technological environments to investigate and understand the impact of cultures on shaping architecture and our world, as well. Utzon emphasized on the synthesis of form, material, and also social function, thus his fascination and openness to world architecture emphasized and progressed his architectural design process. In our globalized world it is indeed very inspiring to be studying how Utzon connects his architecture with nature using his Nordic sense of the surroundings, and connecting his vision with world architecture through understanding the diversity of our world sphere. Our world is full of rich icons and images that people identify themselves with. ![]() ![]() The architectural sculpture seems to be compelling to the international society around Sydney, using its international morphological style recalling the shells and the sea culture. Jorn Utzon’s architectural designs and especially the Opera of Sydney have always intrigued designers for their dynamic structures, and transcultural aspects. ![]() The contemporary architectural main stream can be potentially improved to define a paradigmatic methodology of innovative and elaborate architecture, at the intersection of transcultural influences. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |